Crisis of Truth
Half-truths. Selective omissions. Outright lies. The information exists — they just count on you never looking it up.
"There is no bottom to the depravity of the human soul if left on its own."
A 10-minute search reveals a completely different story than the one you were told.
The narrative: "Tim Walz allowed fraud to happen and did nothing to stop it."
The documented reality: State officials identified fraud in July 2019 — before the pandemic. They tried to stop payments in December 2020. They were blocked by a lawsuit and told by the FBI not to interfere with the federal investigation. The judge who supposedly "ordered" payments to continue issued a rare public statement calling that claim "false."
The lesson: All of this was publicly searchable. Court records. Judge statements. Department timelines. They counted on you not looking it up.
Click to expand each case study. The patterns are everywhere once you learn to see them.
According to a groundbreaking working paper by Carter C. Price and Kathryn Edwards of the RAND Corporation, had the more equitable income distributions of the three decades following World War II (1945–1974) merely held steady, the aggregate annual income of Americans earning below the 90th percentile would have been $2.5 trillion higher in 2018 alone.
The cumulative figure? $50 trillion — redistributed upward from the bottom 90% to the top 1% over the past several decades.
This isn't speculation. It's not partisan rhetoric. It's a peer-reviewed economic analysis using decades of income data.
Ask yourself: Why isn't this the lead story every night? Why do you know more about celebrity drama than the systematic extraction of $50 trillion from working Americans?
Read the TIME Article →This video demonstrates pure propaganda in action. Watch how the same media figures flip their positions on NSA surveillance based solely on which party holds power:
Such inconsistencies underscore the importance of objective, fact-based reporting — and why it's so rare.
Had the Fairness Doctrine remained in effect — a policy repealed during the Reagan era — media figures might have been held to a more consistent standard of accountability. The doctrine required broadcasters to present contrasting viewpoints on controversial issues. Its elimination opened the door to the partisan echo chambers we see today.
Presentation is never what it seems. You have to dig deeper past the narrative.
A good example occurred during a Florida election when a marijuana legalization bill was on the ballot. Sheriffs ran ads warning that legalization would make public spaces reek of marijuana, even suggesting people would smoke in restaurants.
That claim didn't hold up to basic scrutiny. What was really at stake was a revenue stream: civil asset forfeiture.
Under forfeiture laws, police can seize property — cars, cash, homes — without ever charging the owner with a crime, let alone convicting them. If marijuana were legal, law enforcement would lose a mechanism that allows them to take grandma's car over a joint and force her to prove her innocence to get it back.
I worked for the Minneapolis Police Department for five years as a computer specialist. I saw firsthand how often people's property was taken with no conviction and little public awareness. What still surprises me is how rarely the media reports on the systemic abuse of civil asset forfeiture.
Learning to question narratives and seeing how systems actually operate made me slower to accept claims at face value — but much clearer when I speak.
George Orwell's 1984 depicted "Hate Week" — organized events designed to focus public anger on designated enemies of the state. It was meant as a warning.
Soviet literary theorist John Rodden noted that Orwell's "Hate Week" anticipated anti-American events in the Soviet Union that followed the book's publication. Scholar Scott Boulding argues there are similarities between the dystopian hate week and Stalinist efforts to supplant religion with devotional services to the state.
The question for today: When you watch cable news, social media outrage cycles, or political rallies — how different is the mechanism? Designated enemies. Focused hatred. Two Minutes of Hate, extended to 24/7 coverage.
Watch the Clip →Sometimes long relationships end not because of politics, but because of values.
I stopped spending time with someone I had known for decades after witnessing behavior that conflicted with basic honesty and accountability. He sold a defective firearm to a mutual acquaintance while knowing it had serious issues. The problem was not disclosed at the time of the sale, and when the buyer later realized what had happened and asked for a refund, it was refused.
That moment changed how I viewed him. I had always believed he was a stand-up person, and seeing him avoid responsibility made it difficult to continue the relationship.
We had shared many important moments over the years, which made the realization even harder. Sometimes you learn, even after decades, that you did not truly know someone as well as you thought.
This isn't about political labels. It's about whether someone operates with integrity when it costs them something. The same principle applies to evaluating media, politicians, and institutions: Watch what they do when no one's looking. Watch what they do when it's inconvenient.
"They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets... It's a big club, and you ain't in it."— George Carlin
"You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their prejudices quicker than you can convince one man by logic."— Robert A. Heinlein
Download and share these images. Click any image to view full size.
RAND Corporation study on wealth redistribution
How fabricated stories distract from real history
Questions to ask before sharing
What happens when critical thinking disappears
Robert A. Heinlein on manipulation
Share this page with others
For those ready to understand how the system actually works.
Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist David Cay Johnston has spent decades documenting how the tax code, regulations, and legal structures have been systematically rigged to benefit corporations and the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.
This video shows how corporations legally dodge taxes — and it's shockingly creative. The loopholes aren't bugs; they're features, written by lobbyists and passed by the politicians they fund.
Watch the Video →By David Cay Johnston
There needs to be one thread of truth in every believable lie. Although corporate promises sound good, the reality is far different.
This book gives you the facts on Big Business and its failure to pay taxes. You will discover that all of us would have 40% more money in our pockets if big businesses paid their fair share.
Johnston exposes how corporations legally steal billions through hidden fees, rigged contracts, and privatization schemes. Billionaires are robbing us blind, and no one talks about it. Healthcare debates? Just a drop in the bucket compared to what's being extracted through fine print.
Get the Book →By Jane Mayer
In her fourth book, Mayer draws on court records, extensive interviews, and private archives to examine the growing political influence of extreme libertarians among the one percent — including the Koch brothers.
She traces their ideas about taxation and government regulation, and their savvy use of lobbyists to further an agenda that advances their own interests at the expense of meaningful economic, environmental, and labor reform.
The book sheds light on how the nation has been infiltrated and dominated by a select group of ultra-wealthy individuals. These individuals exert significant control over the political landscape by leveraging their financial resources to influence politicians and shape public policy — effectively diverting tax dollars away from the general population and into their own pockets.
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt."
War is a Racket & The Plot to Seize the White House
Many people don't know that in 1933, a group of wealthy industrialists — working closely with groups like the KKK and the American Liberty League — planned to overthrow the U.S. government and run FDR out of office in a fascist coup.
Their plan: turn unhappy war veterans into American brown shirts, depose Roosevelt, and stop the New Deal.
They asked Medal of Honor recipient and Marine Major General Smedley Darlington Butler to work with them and become the first American Caesar.
Fortunately, Butler was a true patriot. Instead of working for the fascist coup, he revealed the plot to journalists and to Congress.
Butler also wrote "War is a Racket," exposing how wars are fought by the poor to enrich the wealthy. His famous quote: "I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers."
Get the Book →Call your representatives. Ask why they serve the wealthy instead of you. Let them know you're watching.
This is the U.S. Capitol Switchboard. Ask to be connected to your Senator or Representative.
Both parties are responsible. Hold them accountable.
A framework for cutting through any narrative.
Every story benefits someone. Identify who gains authority, influence, or control from the narrative being pushed.
Follow the financial incentives. Who profits if you believe this story? Whose revenue depends on your outrage or fear?
What rights, regulations, or safeguards are being eroded while you're distracted by the main narrative?
If someone with worse intentions had this power or precedent, how could they use it? That's usually how it will be used.