PRIMARY SOURCES. NO SPIN. NO ADS.  |  CRISISOFTRUTH.ORG
CrisisOfTruth.org

// THE DOCKET

The Trump Cases:
What the record actually shows

Ten charges you have seen listed as fact. Sorted here by what was actually established in court — and the sorting is the story.

1Convicted
1Civil liability
3No verdict
2Not charged
3Never adjudicated

Graphics circulate listing ten Trump “crimes” under headlines like Not allegations. Verified actions. Nine of the ten on those lists are not convictions. Some are indictments that never reached a jury. One cites a report that expressly declined to conclude a crime occurred.

That matters, and not because the underlying conduct is trivial. It matters because a list that overstates its evidence can be dismantled in an afternoon — and once it is, everything on it gets thrown out together, including the parts that are true. Below, each item sits at the level the record supports. The blocks get visually fainter as the evidence gets thinner. That is deliberate.

Convicted1 of 10

A jury heard the evidence and returned a verdict.

Falsifying Business Records — New York State

Convicted · 30 May 2024 · 34 felony counts

A Manhattan jury convicted on all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, relating to reimbursements for a hush-money payment. Sentenced 10 January 2025 to an unconditional discharge — no jail, no fine, no probation. The conviction stands and is under appeal; in August 2026 a federal judge rejected an attempt to move the case to federal court.

Note on labelling: lists often file this under “campaign finance violations.” The conviction was for falsifying business records. The campaign-finance element was the underlying-crime theory, not the charge.

Civil liability upheld — penalty voided1 of 10

A court found liability. It is civil, not criminal, and the penalty did not survive appeal.

Business Fraud — New York Attorney General

Liability upheld · 21 August 2025 · Civil

Liability under New York Executive Law §63(12) — repeatedly submitting deceptive financial statements to banks and insurers — was upheld by the Appellate Division, First Department. The same ruling struck down the roughly $527 million penalty as an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment.

Two corrections to the usual framing: this was not a criminal case, and there was no tax fraud finding. Lists that label it “tax fraud” are naming a crime no court found.

Charged — case ended without a verdict3 of 10

A grand jury found probable cause. No jury ever weighed the evidence.

Classified Documents — Federal (S.D. Fla.)

Dismissed July 2024 · Appeal dropped November 2024

Indicted June 2023 over retention of national-defence records and alleged obstruction of their return. Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the case in July 2024, ruling the special counsel had been unlawfully appointed. The appeal was abandoned in November 2024. The dismissal turned on who brought the case, not on what the documents were.

Federal Election Case — District of Columbia

Dropped November 2024

Indicted August 2023 on conspiracy charges relating to the 2020 election. Dropped after the 2024 election under longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. No court assessed the evidence.

Georgia RICO — Fulton County

Charges dropped 26 November 2025

Indicted August 2023 under Georgia's racketeering statute. The elected district attorney was disqualified over a conflict of interest, and the replacement prosecutor dropped the charges against all remaining defendants in November 2025. The case ended over who was prosecuting it.

Investigated — not charged2 of 10

Officially examined. No charge was ever brought.

Obstruction of Justice

Examined · No conclusion reached · No charge

The Mueller Report examined multiple episodes of possible obstruction and pointedly declined to reach a judgment. Its own words: while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

This is the item that most often breaks these lists. Citing Mueller as proof of obstruction cites a document for the opposite of what it says.

Self-Dealing & Use of Office

Documented spending · No charge

Government Accountability Office reporting and press investigations documented public money spent at Trump-owned properties during his first term. That is a documented expenditure record. It was never charged as a crime, and “abuse of office” is not itself a federal offence.

Alleged — never adjudicated3 of 10

Asserted, sometimes litigated, never decided on the merits.

Emoluments Clause

Dismissed as moot · January 2021 · Rulings vacated

Lawsuits alleging unconstitutional acceptance of foreign and domestic payments reached the Supreme Court, which dismissed them as moot once he left office and vacated the lower-court rulings. No court ever decided whether a violation occurred — and the vacatur means the earlier rulings carry no precedential weight.

Witness Tampering

Asserted in filings · No charge, no finding

Raised in court filings and congressional commentary. No charge was brought and no court made a finding. On the public record this remains an allegation.

Public Falsehoods

Documented tally · Not a criminal matter

The Washington Post Fact Checker catalogued 30,573 false or misleading claims across four years in office. That is a documented record and a legitimate thing to cite — but making false statements to the public is not the federal crime of false statements, which concerns lying to federal investigators or agencies.

The part that actually matters

Three cases ended without a verdict. Not one of the three ended because a jury weighed the evidence and acquitted. They ended on:

  • How the prosecutor was appointed — classified documents
  • A Justice Department policy about sitting presidents — the federal election case
  • A district attorney's personal conflict of interest — Georgia

That is a far more interesting fact than “ten crimes,” and unlike “ten crimes,” it survives being checked. Whether those endings were proper is a real argument with serious people on both sides. What is not arguable is that none of them was a finding about the underlying conduct.

What this page does not claim

It does not claim the dropped cases would have ended in conviction. Charges are allegations; a case ending without a verdict leaves the question open, and the presumption of innocence is not a technicality.

It does not claim the dismissals were improper. A ruling that a prosecutor was unlawfully appointed is a real constitutional holding, not a dodge. A policy against prosecuting a sitting president long predates this president and was written by the Justice Department itself.

It does not claim the untried allegations are false. It claims only that they are untried — which is what the word “alleged” means, and why it belongs on them.

The strongest case for the other side, stated fairly: that three serious prosecutions collapsed on procedure rather than proof is itself an argument that the evidence was never fairly tested. That argument is available to anyone who wants it. It is not the same as saying the charges were proven, and this page will not pretend otherwise.

Sources — check every one

  1. New York conviction, 34 counts, 30 May 2024; sentencing 10 January 2025: CNBC, “Trump sentenced to unconditional discharge”
  2. Appeal status, August 2026: CNBC, “Trump loses bid to transfer New York hush money case to federal court”
  3. Civil fraud — liability upheld, $527M penalty voided, 21 August 2025: Lawfare, “N.Y. Appeals Court Voids Fine, Upholds Judgment” · CBS News
  4. Federal cases — both ended November 2024: Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (case history and dispositions)
  5. Georgia charges dropped, 26 November 2025: NPR · CNN
  6. Emoluments — dismissed as moot, rulings vacated, January 2021: SCOTUSblog · Brennan Center
  7. 30,573 false or misleading claims over four years: Washington Post Fact Checker
  8. Mueller Report, Volume II, conclusion on obstruction: U.S. Department of Justice — full report (PDF)